Objection to denial of justice: sufficiency of reasoning when right to be heard allegedly violated
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH), 11th Civil Senate, rejected the plaintiffs' objection to the denial of justice (Anhörungsrüge) at their own expense, upholding the court's prior dismissal of their appeal. The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiffs alleged that the Senate had violated their constitutional right to be heard by overlooking their substantive arguments in a preceding decision dated March 30, 2021. The court ruled that the right to be heard was not violated in a manner relevant to the decision, finding that the challenged submissions had been reviewed and deemed insufficient, and relied on the discretionary power under Section 544 Paragraph 6 Sentence 2 Half-sentence 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) to omit a detailed legal justification, citing corresponding application of Section 321a Paragraph 4 Sentence 5 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 321a Abs. 4 Satz 5 ZPO, § 321a Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 4 Satz 3 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO; Objection to denial of justice: sufficiency of reasoning when right to be heard allegedly violated: The dispute concerned a civil matter where the plaintiffs alleged that the Senate had violated their constitutional right to be heard by overlooking their substantive arguments in a preceding decision dated March 30, 2021. The court ruled that the right to be heard was not violated in a manner relevant to the decision, finding that the challenged submissions had been reviewed and deemed insufficient, and relied on the discretionary power under Section 544 Paragraph 6 Sentence 2 Half-sentence 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) to omit a detailed legal justification, citing corresponding application of Section 321a Paragraph 4 Sentence 5 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertMain procedural basis for rejecting the objection to denial of justice due to the absence of a relevant violation of the right to be heard.
Procedural provision allowing the court to omit a detailed legal justification for the rejection of the objection.
Volltext
Die Anhörungsrüge der Kläger gegen den Beschluss des Senats vom 30. März 2021 wird auf ihre Kosten zurückgewiesen, weil der Senat den Anspruch der Kläger auf rechtliches Gehör nicht in entscheidungs-erheblicher Weise verletzt hat (§ 321a Abs. 1 Satz 1, Abs. 4 Satz 3 ZPO). Der Senat hat das als übergangen gerügte Vorbringen geprüft und für nicht durchgreifend erachtet. Von einer näheren Begründung wird nach § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO abgesehen, der im Anwendungsbereich des § 321a Abs. 4 Satz 5 ZPO entsprechend anwendbar ist (vgl. BVerfGK 18, 301, 307; Senatsbeschlüsse vom 9. August 2017 - XI ZR 200/17, juris Rn. 3, vom 25. April 2018 - XI ZR 589/17, juris Rn. 2 und vom 13. Januar 2021 - XI ZR 246/19, juris, jeweils mwN).
Ellenberger
Matthias
Menges
Schild von Spannenberg
Allgayer