Inadmissibility of appeal for leave not granted in EGGVG procedure under § 29 para. 1 EGGVG
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice's 5th Criminal Senate rejected the applicant's appeal as inadmissible, leaving the lower court's decision to dismiss the initial application intact. The case involved a procedural challenge under the Act on the Organization of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Federal Court of Justice (EGGVG), where the applicant filed requests pursuant to §§ 23–27 EGGVG, which the Kammergericht had previously dismissed as inadmissible. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was § 29 para. 1 EGGVG, which provides that an appeal by way of revision (Rechtsbeschwerde) is only permissible if expressly granted in the challenged order; since the lower court had not granted leave to appeal and no exception applied, the appeal was barred as a matter of law.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG; Inadmissibility of appeal for leave not granted in EGGVG procedure under § 29 para. 1 EGGVG: The case involved a procedural challenge under the Act on the Organization of the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Federal Court of Justice (EGGVG), where the applicant filed requests pursuant to §§ 23–27 EGGVG, which the Kammergericht had previously dismissed as inadmissible. The decisive legal basis for the rejection was § 29 para. 1 EGGVG, which provides that an appeal by way of revision (Rechtsbeschwerde) is only permissible if expressly granted in the challenged order; since the lower court had not granted leave to appeal and no exception applied, the appeal was barred as a matter of law.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertMain ground for rejecting the appeal as inadmissible because leave to appeal had not been granted in the lower court's order.
Volltext
Die Rechtsbeschwerde der Antragstellerin gegen den Beschluss des Kammergerichts vom 13. Juli 2022 wird auf ihre Kosten als unzulässig verworfen.
[GRUENDE]
Der als Rechtsbeschwerde auszulegende Antrag betreffend den Beschluss des Kammergerichts vom 13. Juli 2022, mit dem die „Anträge gemäß § 23 bis § 27 EGGVG“ als unzulässig verworfen wurden, ist unzulässig, weil die Rechtsbeschwerde in dem angefochtenen Beschluss nicht zugelassen wurde (§ 29 Abs. 1 EGGVG). Die Nichtzulassung ist grundsätzlich unanfechtbar, ein etwaiger Ausnahmetatbestand liegt nicht vor (vgl. Meyer-Goßner/Schmitt, 65. Aufl., § 29 EGGVG Rn. 2).
Cirener
Mosbacher
Köhler
von Häfen
Werner