Partial acquittal on criminal appeal via revision with state cost liability
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the lower court's conviction but reducing the sentence and ordering the state to bear the costs associated with the revised portion of the judgment; the defendant was acquitted on certain charges in accordance with the request of the Federal General Public Prosecutor. The case involved a criminal appeal against a judgment by the Berlin Regional Court, challenging the sufficiency of evidence and the legal evaluation of specific charges, resulting in a partial acquittal. The decision rests on the procedural rules governing criminal appeals and the substantive criminal law provisions applicable to the contested offenses, confirming that the revised conviction is legally sound despite the errors identified in the lower court's judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertPartial acquittal on criminal appeal via revision with state cost liability: The case involved a criminal appeal against a judgment by the Berlin Regional Court, challenging the sufficiency of evidence and the legal evaluation of specific charges, resulting in a partial acquittal. The decision rests on the procedural rules governing criminal appeals and the substantive criminal law provisions applicable to the contested offenses, confirming that the revised conviction is legally sound despite the errors identified in the lower court's judgment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin vom 25. Mai 2023 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass der Angeklagte im Übrigen freigesprochen ist (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts) und die Staatskasse insoweit die Kosten des Verfahrens und seine notwendigen Auslagen trägt.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seiner Revision zu tragen.
Cirener
Gericke
Köhler
Resch
von Häfen