Correction of Confiscation Amount in Criminal Judgment Without Full Reversal
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 5th Criminal Senate rejected the defendant's appeal against the Hamburg Regional Court's judgment dated June 30, 2023, ruling that no legal errors to the defendant's detriment were found, but modified the decision by reducing the confiscation amount from €14,532.27 to €14,273.75 in accordance with the General Public Prosecutor's request, leaving the underlying conviction in force and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the appeal. The dispute centered on the calculation and enforcement of confiscation (Einziehung) in a criminal proceeding, where the final operative outcome affirmed the substantive criminal liability but adjusted the financial penalty based on procedural corrections to the value of the confiscated assets or proceeds. The decisive legal basis involves the statutory framework for criminal confiscation and the appellate review standards for correcting specific amounts within a criminal judgment without requiring a full retrial.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCorrection of Confiscation Amount in Criminal Judgment Without Full Reversal: The dispute centered on the calculation and enforcement of confiscation (Einziehung) in a criminal proceeding, where the final operative outcome affirmed the substantive criminal liability but adjusted the financial penalty based on procedural corrections to the value of the confiscated assets or proceeds. The decisive legal basis involves the statutory framework for criminal confiscation and the appellate review standards for correcting specific amounts within a criminal judgment without requiring a full retrial.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Hamburg vom 30. Juni 2023 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass der Einziehungsbetrag von 14.532,27 Euro auf 14.273,75 Euro herabgesetzt wird (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts); im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Cirener
Mosbacher
Köhler
von Häfen
Werner