Admission of Revision on dispute over interest accrual on out-of-court attorney fees
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) partially dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for non-admission but admitted the plaintiff's appeal (Revision) against the Munich Higher Regional Court's decision from March 30, 2023, thereby allowing the case to proceed to the highest court on the merits. The dispute concerned a civil procedure where the plaintiff challenged the lower appellate court's refusal to release them from paying interest on out-of-court attorney fees. The BGH exercised its supervisory review under § 544 ZPO, rejecting the plaintiff's argument for interest exemption based on precedent that such fees are generally subject to interest, while admitting the broader appeal for the remainder of the legal issues. No oral hearing or extensive written reasoning was provided, as permitted under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO for non-admission complaints.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO; Admission of Revision on dispute over interest accrual on out-of-court attorney fees: The dispute concerned a civil procedure where the plaintiff challenged the lower appellate court's refusal to release them from paying interest on out-of-court attorney fees. The BGH exercised its supervisory review under § 544 ZPO, rejecting the plaintiff's argument for interest exemption based on precedent that such fees are generally subject to interest, while admitting the broader appeal for the remainder of the legal issues. No oral hearing or extensive written reasoning was provided, as permitted under § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO for non-admission complaints.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the decision on the non-admission complaint.
Volltext
Auf die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde des Klägers wird - unter deren Zurückweisung im Umfang der begehrten Freistellung von Zinsen auf die außergerichtlichen Rechtsanwaltskosten (vgl. BGH, Urteil vom 14. März 2017 - XI ZR 508/15, NJW-RR 2017, 942 Rn. 34; Urteil vom 12. Oktober 2017 - IX ZR 267/17, NJW 2018, 1006 Rn. 28) - die Revision gegen den Beschluss des 19. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München vom 30. März 2023 zugelassen.
Von einer Begründung wird gemäß § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO abgesehen.
Menges
Möhring
Krüger
Wille
Liepin