Criminal revision dismissed following grant of reinstatement after missed deadline to file revision reasoning

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) granted the defendant restoration to his pre-deadline status and subsequently dismissed his appeal against the Landgericht Hamburg's conviction as unfounded, leaving the lower court's judgment in force and ordering the defendant to bear the legal costs. The dispute involved a procedural challenge to the Landgericht Hamburg's rejection of the defendant's revision (appeal) as inadmissible due to a missed deadline for filing the appeal justification. The court applied principles of procedural law regarding the extension of statutory deadlines, determining that the defendant's application for reinstatement was valid and that a substantive review of the appeal on its merits revealed no legal errors to the defendant's detriment.