Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
2 ARs 166/21, 2 ARs 173/21, 2 ARs 203/21, 2 ARs 277/21, 2 ARs 278/21, 2 ARs 299/21, 2 ARs 300/21, 2 ARs 302/21, 2 ARs 314/21, 2 ARs 40/22, 2 ARs 51/22, 2 ARs 137/22, 2 ARs 138/22, 2 ARs 188/22, 2 ARs 364/22 ECLI:DE:BGH:2023:101023B2ARS166.21.1 KI-generiert

Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions

Geschäftsnummer 2 ARs 166/21, 2 ARs 173/21, 2 ARs 203/21, 2 ARs 277/21, 2 ARs 278/21, 2 ARs 299/21, 2 ARs 300/21, 2 ARs 302/21, 2 ARs 314/21, 2 ARs 40/22, 2 ARs 51/22, 2 ARs 137/22, 2 ARs 138/22, 2 ARs 188/22, 2 ARs 364/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ordered the consolidation of fifteen separate criminal complaint proceedings for joint decision, designating one case file to lead. The dispute involved a single complainant challenging various procedural decisions issued by three different Higher Regional Courts (Oberlandesgerichte Stuttgart, Bamberg, and Hamm) via multiple legal remedies. The court did not address the merits of the underlying complaints in this ruling; instead, it focused on the procedural joinder of the cases. The decisive legal basis for this order was the finding that the individual decisions shared both a personal and substantive connection, justifying their unification to ensure consistent and efficient adjudication.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions: Die Verfahren 2 ARs 166/21, 2 ARs 173/21, 2 ARs 203/21, 2 ARs 277/21, 2 ARs 278/21, 2 ARs 299/21, 2 ARs 300/21, 2 ARs 302/21, 2 ARs 314/21, 2 ARs 40/22, 2 ARs 51/22, 2 ARs 137/22, 2 ARs 138/22, 2 ARs 188/22 und 2 ARs 364/22 werden zur gemeinsamen Entscheidung miteinander verbunden. Das Verfahren 2 ARs 166/21 führt.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
strafrechtliches Revisionsverfahren Vereinigung von Verfahren prozessleitende Verfügungen E-Justice Justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen Personalakte

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
2 ARs 166/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
2 ARs 173/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
2 ARs 203/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
2 ARs 277/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
2 ARs 278/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
2 ARs 299/21
Joinder of criminal revision proceedings based on personal and substantive connection among multiple Oberlandesgericht decisions
KI-generiert
1 StR 627/09
Joinder of related criminal proceedings pending before different court levels under §§ 4, 5 StPO
2 ARs 118/25
Consolidation of pending criminal proceedings under different appellate jurisdictions for comprehensive adjudication
2 ARs 354/25
Joinder of criminal proceedings pending before courts of different rank under § 4 StPO
2 ARs 29/25
Consolidation of parallel criminal proceedings for comprehensive trial via § 4(2) StPO
2 ARs 3/24
Joinder of parallel criminal proceedings for joint adjudication based on the interest of comprehensive investigation

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Verfahren 2 ARs 166/21, 2 ARs 173/21, 2 ARs 203/21, 2 ARs 277/21, 2 ARs 278/21, 2 ARs 299/21, 2 ARs 300/21, 2 ARs 302/21, 2 ARs 314/21, 2 ARs 40/22, 2 ARs 51/22, 2 ARs 137/22, 2 ARs 138/22, 2 ARs 188/22 und 2 ARs 364/22 werden zur gemeinsamen Entscheidung miteinander verbunden. Das Verfahren 2 ARs 166/21 führt.

[GRUENDE]

Der Beschwerdeführer wendet sich mit einer Vielzahl von Rechtsbehelfen gegen verschiedene Entscheidungen der Oberlandesgerichte Stuttgart, Bamberg und Hamm. Diese sind miteinander zur Entscheidung zu verbinden. Sie stehen in einem persönlichen und sachlichen Zusammenhang.

Appl Grube Schmidt