Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
II ZB 14/22 ECLI:DE:BGH:2023:220923BIIZB14.22.0 KI-generiert

Model litigation: Designation of new representative plaintiff upon settlement and withdrawal

Geschäftsnummer II ZB 14/22
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Court of Justice (II ZB 14/22) ordered that the original representative plaintiff withdrew from the model litigation appeal due to a settlement in the underlying case and formally designated a registered party as the new representative plaintiff and appellant, while simultaneously designating them as the representative respondent against the original defendant’s appeal; this procedural ruling, issued by the 2nd Civil Senate on September 22, 2023, resolved the change of party status under § 21(3) and § 21(4) of the Model Proceeding Act (KapMuG), confirming the legal basis for the court’s ex officio determination to simplify the proceedings under § 13(1) KapMuG in a collective consumer protection matter.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG, § 13 Abs. 1 KapMuG, § 21 Abs. 3 Satz 2 KapMuG; Model litigation: Designation of new representative plaintiff upon settlement and withdrawal: The German Federal Court of Justice (II ZB 14/22) ordered that the original representative plaintiff withdrew from the model litigation appeal due to a settlement in the underlying case and formally designated a registered party as the new representative plaintiff and appellant, while simultaneously designating them as the representative respondent against the original defendant’s appeal; this procedural ruling, issued by the 2nd Civil Senate on September 22, 2023, resolved the change of party status under § 21(3) and § 21(4) of the Model Proceeding Act (KapMuG), confirming the legal basis for the court’s ex officio determination to simplify the proceedings under § 13(1) KapMuG in a collective consumer protection matter.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verbraucherschutz Rechtsstellung Gesetzlicher Schutz prozessleitende Verfügungen Sammelauftrag E-Justice

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG
Basis for the original plaintiff's withdrawal from the model appeal due to settlement in the underlying proceedings.
§ 13 Abs. 1 KapMuG
Legal basis for the court's determination of the new representative plaintiff to simplify the proceedings.
§ 21 Abs. 3 Satz 2 KapMuG
Ground for designating the new representative plaintiff as the representative respondent in the defendant's appeal.
KI-generiert
XI ZB 25/22
Selection of model appellant and respondent under reasonable discretion in model litigation appeal
II ZB 21/22
KapMuG model proceedings: designation of Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin and recharacterization of joinder appeal as Beitritt under § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG
XI ZB 2/24
Designation of a single model respondent and publication of notice in the claim register under the Model Collective Proceedings Act.
XI ZB 24/23
Designation of representative respondent in pattern litigation and mandatory public notice of appeal

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG

Basis for the original plaintiff's withdrawal from the model appeal due to settlement in the underlying proceedings.

§ 13 Abs. 1 KapMuG

Legal basis for the court's determination of the new representative plaintiff to simplify the proceedings.

§ 21 Abs. 3 Satz 2 KapMuG

Ground for designating the new representative plaintiff as the representative respondent in the defendant's appeal.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Musterklägerin ist durch den Abschluss eines Vergleichs in dem sie betreffenden Ausgangsverfahren entsprechend § 21 Abs. 4 KapMuG aus dem Musterrechtsbeschwerdeverfahren ausgeschieden.

Der Beigetretene M. wird zum Musterkläger und zum Musterrechtsbeschwerdeführer hinsichtlich der Rechtsbeschwerde der bisherigen Musterklägerin bestimmt. Die Bestimmung des neuen Musterklägers (§ 13 Abs. 1 KapMuG) kann aus Gründen der Vereinfachung des Verfahrens durch das Rechtsbeschwerdegericht erfolgen (KK-KapMuG/ Rimmelspacher, 2. Aufl., § 21 Rn. 60; Siegmann in Asmus/ Wachsmuth, Kollektive Rechtsdurchsetzung, § 21 KapMuG Rn. 30). Mit der Bestimmung zum Musterkläger wird der Beigetretene M. gemäß § 21 Abs. 3 Satz 2 KapMuG Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegner hinsichtlich der Rechtsbeschwerde der Musterbeklagten zu 1.

Born

B. Grüneberg

V. Sander

von Selle

Adams