Mootness of judicial confirmation for driver's license revocation and forfeiture already effective upon finality of prior penal order

The Federal Court of Criminal Judgment partially granted the defendant's appeal, vacating the lower court's ruling that upheld the revocation of his driver's license and the forfeiture of the license card, while rejecting the remainder of the appeal; consequently, those specific collateral consequences are deemed lapsed and no longer require judicial confirmation. The dispute concerned the procedural necessity of a new court order to maintain administrative penalties (license revocation and forfeiture) that had already become legally effective immediately upon the finality of a prior penal order. The court held that such a new pronouncement was legally superfluous because the revocation and forfeiture automatically took effect upon the issuance of the final decision in the earlier proceeding, rendering the subject matter of the challenge moot.