Revision against criminal judgment; crediting of foreign extradition custody against domestic total imprisonment sentence
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice rejected the defendant's revision as unfounded, thereby upholding the prior conviction, but modified the sentence by ordering that the time served in extradition custody in the Netherlands be credited against the total imprisonment at a 1:1 ratio, a correction applied both to the appellant and his co-defendant based on the arguments of the Federal Public Prosecutor. The dispute arose from the defendant's appeal against a lower court judgment, where the primary procedural issue concerned the proper calculation of the total sentence following extradition proceedings. The decisive legal basis is the statutory requirement for the proportional deduction of foreign pre-trial detention (specifically extradition custody) from the domestic prison sentence to ensure the correct effective duration of the imposed punishment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertRevision against criminal judgment; crediting of foreign extradition custody against domestic total imprisonment sentence: The dispute arose from the defendant's appeal against a lower court judgment, where the primary procedural issue concerned the proper calculation of the total sentence following extradition proceedings. The decisive legal basis is the statutory requirement for the proportional deduction of foreign pre-trial detention (specifically extradition custody) from the domestic prison sentence to ensure the correct effective duration of the imposed punishment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten A. gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Oldenburg vom 15. Dezember 2022 wird als unbegründet verworfen; jedoch wird es im Strafausspruch aus den vom Generalbundesanwalt zutreffend dargelegten Gründen, auch soweit es den Mitangeklagten I. betrifft, dahin ergänzt, dass jeweils die in den Niederlanden erlittene Auslieferungshaft im Maßstab 1:1 auf die verhängte Gesamtfreiheitsstrafe angerechnet wird.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Berg
Paul
Hohoff
Anstötz
Voigt