Suspension of civil proceedings pending CJEU preliminary ruling on decisive reference question
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ordered the suspension of the civil proceedings pursuant to § 148 ZPO until the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) renders a decision in Case C-40/17, finding that the preliminary question referred by the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf in January 2017 is decisive for the outcome of the present dispute. The case involves a civil matter before the BGH’s 1st Civil Senate where the court determined that the pending reference to the CJEU constitutes a procedural obstacle requiring a stay to ensure consistent application of EU law. No substantive merits were decided, and no party prevailed on the underlying claims; the procedural posture is currently stayed pending the CJEU’s preliminary ruling.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 148 ZPO; Suspension of civil proceedings pending CJEU preliminary ruling on decisive reference question: The case involves a civil matter before the BGH’s 1st Civil Senate where the court determined that the pending reference to the CJEU constitutes a procedural obstacle requiring a stay to ensure consistent application of EU law. No substantive merits were decided, and no party prevailed on the underlying claims; the procedural posture is currently stayed pending the CJEU’s preliminary ruling.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule applied in the dispositive to order the suspension of the proceedings until the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Volltext
Aussetzung des Verfahrens wegen Vorabentscheidungsersuchen an EuGH
[TENOR]
Das Verfahren wird in entsprechender Anwendung von § 148 ZPO bis zur Entscheidung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Union in der Rechtssache C-40/17 über das Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des 20. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Düsseldorf vom 19. Januar 2017 ausgesetzt, weil die dort zur Vorabentscheidung vorgelegte Frage 1 auch im vorliegenden Streitfall entscheidungserheblich ist.
Koch
Schaffert
Kirchhoff
Löffler
Schwonke