Reinstatement into the status prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing an appeal against a criminal judgment
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Criminal Procedure granted the defendant's motion for reinstatement to the status prior to the expiration of the appeal deadline, allowing the defendant to file an appeal against the lower court's judgment at the defendant's own expense. The dispute centered on a procedural challenge where the defendant sought to remedy a missed deadline to file a legal revision against a criminal judgment rendered by the Landgericht Stendal. The court applied the doctrine of reinstatement for missed deadlines and established that the statutory period for the lower court to supplement abbreviated trial grounds commences upon the court's receipt of the case files, while the deadline for the defendant to provide grounds for revision begins only upon service of the completed judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertReinstatement into the status prior to the expiration of the deadline for filing an appeal against a criminal judgment: The dispute centered on a procedural challenge where the defendant sought to remedy a missed deadline to file a legal revision against a criminal judgment rendered by the Landgericht Stendal. The court applied the doctrine of reinstatement for missed deadlines and established that the statutory period for the lower court to supplement abbreviated trial grounds commences upon the court's receipt of the case files, while the deadline for the defendant to provide grounds for revision begins only upon service of the completed judgment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Dem Angeklagten wird auf seinen Antrag und seine Kosten Wiedereinsetzung in den Stand vor Ablauf der Frist zur Einlegung der Revision gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Stendal vom 9. Dezember 2022 gewährt.
Die Frist zur Ergänzung der abgekürzten Urteilsgründe beginnt mit dem Eingang der Akten beim Landgericht (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 10. September 2008 – 2 StR 134/08, BGHSt 52, 349). Mit der Zustellung des gegebenenfalls ergänzten Urteils beginnt die Frist zur Begründung der Revision (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 15. Januar 2009 – 3 StR 601/08).
Sander
Tiemann
Wenske
Fritsche
Arnoldi