Criminal revision for false or misleading pleadings in alternative objection under § 349 Abs. 2 StPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the judgment of the Landgericht Kleve dated October 17, 2022, and ordered the appellant to bear the costs of the legal remedy. The case involved a criminal proceeding in which the defendant challenged the lower court's conviction, raising an alternative procedural objection in the revision. The Court determined that the review of the judgment based on the revision's justification revealed no legal error to the defendant's detriment, thereby rejecting the appeal. The decision was grounded in § 349 Abs. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO), which governs the dismissal of revisions when no disadvantageous legal errors are identified during the appellate review.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO; Criminal revision for false or misleading pleadings in alternative objection under § 349 Abs. 2 StPO: The case involved a criminal proceeding in which the defendant challenged the lower court's conviction, raising an alternative procedural objection in the revision. The Court determined that the review of the judgment based on the revision's justification revealed no legal error to the defendant's detriment, thereby rejecting the appeal. The decision was grounded in § 349 Abs. 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO), which governs the dismissal of revisions when no disadvantageous legal errors are identified during the appellate review.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the operative part to justify the dismissal of the revision as unfounded.
Volltext
Die Revision der Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Kleve vom 17. Oktober 2022 wird als unbegründet verworfen, da die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil der Angeklagten ergeben hat (§ 349 Abs. 2 StPO).
Die Beschwerdeführerin hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Ergänzend bemerkt der Senat:
Die von der Revision erhobene Alternativrüge ist nicht wegen falschen bzw. irreführenden Vortrags unzulässig, dringt aber aus den weiteren vom Generalbundesanwalt dargelegten Gründen nicht durch.
Schäfer
Paul
Berg
Erbguth
Kreicker