Revision challenging criminal conviction; joint and several liability for €2.22M confiscation (Einziehung)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's appeal as groundless, upholding the Cologne Regional Court's conviction, but modified the judgment to order the defendant to pay a confiscation amount of €2,220,000 as a joint and several debtor; the appeal challenged the lower court's decision, which had imposed a liability different from the final joint and several obligation, effectively resulting in a partial correction of the financial penalty within an appeal against a criminal conviction. The decisive legal basis concerns the scope and structure of *Einziehung* (forfeiture/confiscation) liabilities, specifically the imposition of joint and several liability (*Gesamtschuldnerschaft*) for the confiscation sum, where the appellate court corrected the procedural form of the defendant's debt without overturning the underlying conviction.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 343 StPO; Revision challenging criminal conviction; joint and several liability for €2.22M confiscation (Einziehung): The decisive legal basis concerns the scope and structure of *Einziehung* (forfeiture/confiscation) liabilities, specifically the imposition of joint and several liability (*Gesamtschuldnerschaft*) for the confiscation sum, where the appellate court corrected the procedural form of the defendant's debt without overturning the underlying conviction.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis for the rejection of the revision as groundless and the imposition of joint and several liability for the forfeiture amount in the operative part of the judgment.
Volltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Köln vom 19. Januar 2022 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass der Angeklagte in Höhe eines Betrages von 2.220.000,00 Euro als Gesamtschuldner des Einziehungsbetrages haftet. Im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Franke
Krehl
Eschelbach
Meyberg
Schmidt