One-for-one credit of foreign extradition detention in criminal sentencing
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the Leipzig Regional Court's conviction of October 17, 2022, while modifying the judgment to mandate a one-to-one credit for the time served in extradition detention in Poland; the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The case involved a criminal revision challenging the lower court's sentencing calculation regarding foreign pre-trial detention. The decisive legal basis is the doctrine of extradition detention credit, requiring that time spent in custody abroad in connection with the specific charges be deducted from the German prison term on a day-for-day basis to prevent double punishment and ensure fair sentencing equivalence.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertOne-for-one credit of foreign extradition detention in criminal sentencing: The case involved a criminal revision challenging the lower court's sentencing calculation regarding foreign pre-trial detention. The decisive legal basis is the doctrine of extradition detention credit, requiring that time spent in custody abroad in connection with the specific charges be deducted from the German prison term on a day-for-day basis to prevent double punishment and ensure fair sentencing equivalence.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Leipzig vom 17. Oktober 2022 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass die in Polen erlittene Auslieferungshaft im Verhältnis 1:1 angerechnet wird (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts). Im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils auf Grund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Cirener
Gericke
Mosbacher
Köhler
Werner