Correction of confiscation amount in criminal sentencing
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded against the Berlin Regional Court's judgment dated February 8, 2024, with the specific modification that the forfeiture amount was reduced by €20 to a total of €71,044.73, a change adopted from the Public Prosecutor General's proposal; the defendant bears the costs of the legal remedy. The case involved a review of a criminal conviction and the associated order for the confiscation of benefits, where the appellate court conducted a legal re-examination of the lower court's decision. The decisive legal basis relied on the standard appellate review of criminal convictions and the calculation of forfeiture amounts, resulting in a minor numerical correction to the financial order while upholding the underlying criminal liability and all other aspects of the original judgment.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCorrection of confiscation amount in criminal sentencing: The case involved a review of a criminal conviction and the associated order for the confiscation of benefits, where the appellate court conducted a legal re-examination of the lower court's decision. The decisive legal basis relied on the standard appellate review of criminal convictions and the calculation of forfeiture amounts, resulting in a minor numerical correction to the financial order while upholding the underlying criminal liability and all other aspects of the original judgment.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Berlin I vom 8. Februar 2024 wird mit der Maßgabe als unbegründet verworfen, dass der Einziehungsbetrag um 20 Euro auf nunmehr insgesamt 71.044,73 Euro reduziert wird (vgl. Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts); im Übrigen hat die Nachprüfung des Urteils aufgrund der Revisionsrechtfertigung keinen Rechtsfehler zum Nachteil des Angeklagten ergeben.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Cirener
Gericke
Mosbacher
Köhler
Resch