Confiscation of criminal proceeds: reissuance of value-based confiscation order in place of preserved lower-court ruling
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (6th Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the Landgericht Nürnberg-Fürth judgment of October 17, 2022, but modified the confiscation order based on the General Federal Prosecutor's petition, replacing the preservation of the prior Amtsgericht Erlangen decision with a specific order to confiscate 56,838.90 EUR as the value of criminal proceeds; the defendant bore the costs of the legal remedy. The dispute involved a criminal revision challenging a lower court's conviction and subsequent confiscation rulings, where the appellate court corrected the legal basis for the financial penalty to ensure the correct application of statutory confiscation of the value of proceeds rather than a mere preservation of a prior administrative or juvenile court order. The decisive legal basis rests on the provisions governing the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds (Wert von Taterträgen) and the procedural authority of the higher court to issue clarifying or new confiscation declarations to align the final judgment with statutory requirements.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertConfiscation of criminal proceeds: reissuance of value-based confiscation order in place of preserved lower-court ruling: The dispute involved a criminal revision challenging a lower court's conviction and subsequent confiscation rulings, where the appellate court corrected the legal basis for the financial penalty to ensure the correct application of statutory confiscation of the value of proceeds rather than a mere preservation of a prior administrative or juvenile court order. The decisive legal basis rests on the provisions governing the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds (Wert von Taterträgen) and the procedural authority of the higher court to issue clarifying or new confiscation declarations to align the final judgment with statutory requirements.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Nürnberg-Fürth vom 17. Oktober 2022 wird als unbegründet verworfen; jedoch entfällt aus den Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts die Aufrechterhaltung der Einziehungsentscheidung aus dem Urteil des Amtsgerichts Erlangen vom 12. März 2020.
Der Einziehungsausspruch wird klarstellend wie folgt neu gefasst: Gegen den Angeklagten wird die Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen in Höhe von 56.838,90 Euro angeordnet.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Sander
Feilcke
Tiemann
Wenske
Arnoldi