Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6 StR 8/20 ECLI:DE:BGH:2020:240320B6STR8.20.0 KI-generiert

Sentencing: Application of 1:3 credit ratio for foreign deportation detention in narcotics case

Geschäftsnummer 6 StR 8/20
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Teilweise gutgeheissen (Partially Allowed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Criminal Procedure (BGH) rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded, leaving the lower court's conviction in force, but modified the sentencing order to mandate the credit of nine days of deportation detention incurred in Thailand against the imposed liberty sentence at a 1:3 ratio. The dispute concerned the sentencing calculation for a narcotics offense, specifically the method for converting foreign pre-trial detention into the domestic prison term to prevent the defendant from being disadvantaged by jurisdictional differences. Citing established case law on the necessity of determining specific conversion factors for foreign detention, the court applied a 1:3 scale (one day of Thai detention credited for three days of German imprisonment) as the decisive legal measure to ensure equitable treatment and exclude any potential benefit from the foreign detention conditions.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 454 StPO, § 473 Abs. 4 StPO, § 474 Abs. 1 StPO; Sentencing: Application of 1:3 credit ratio for foreign deportation detention in narcotics case: The dispute concerned the sentencing calculation for a narcotics offense, specifically the method for converting foreign pre-trial detention into the domestic prison term to prevent the defendant from being disadvantaged by jurisdictional differences. Citing established case law on the necessity of determining specific conversion factors for foreign detention, the court applied a 1:3 scale (one day of Thai detention credited for three days of German imprisonment) as the decisive legal measure to ensure equitable treatment and exclude any potential benefit from the foreign detention conditions.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Betäubungsmittelstrafzumessung Haftstrafe strafbare Handlung Fremdes Recht Kreditauftrag Überstellung verurteilter Personen

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 454 StPO
Basis for rejecting the appeal as unfounded and upholding the lower court's conviction, as explicitly cited in the operative order of the decision.
§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO
Grounds the specific order to credit the nine days of foreign detention against the prison sentence at a 1:3 ratio to prevent disadvantage.
§ 474 Abs. 1 StPO
Applied in the dispositive to impose the costs of the legal remedy on the appellant.

Zitierte Rechtsprechung

KI-generiert
5 StR 674/96
April 1997 - 5 StR 674/96, NStZ 1997, 385; vom 5.
4 StR 58/12
Valuation of drug proceeds for forfeiture and 1:1 offset of foreign detention in criminal sentencing
1 StR 299/14
Interplay between foreign detention credit and hardship adjustment in aggregate sentencing
4 StR 514/11
Fraud series with multiple participants: concurrence of offenses depends on individual vs. uniform promotional contribution
KI-generiert
6 StR 231/25
Foreign detention credit for deportation detention: 1:2 ratio applied when deportation precedes formal extradition request
1 StR 247/14
Credit ratio for foreign extradition detention in criminal sentencing judgment
1 StR 299/14
Interplay between foreign detention credit and hardship adjustment in aggregate sentencing
2 StR 63/24
Extradition detention credit at 1:1 ratio in criminal aggregate sentencing
3 StR 403/23
Credit ratio for foreign surrender detention in sentencing for aggravated bodily injury

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 454 StPO

Basis for rejecting the appeal as unfounded and upholding the lower court's conviction, as explicitly cited in the operative order of the decision.

§ 473 Abs. 4 StPO

Grounds the specific order to credit the nine days of foreign detention against the prison sentence at a 1:3 ratio to prevent disadvantage.

§ 474 Abs. 1 StPO

Applied in the dispositive to impose the costs of the legal remedy on the appellant.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Strafbemessung bei Betäubungsmitteldelikt: Anrechung von Abschiebungshaft in Thailand

[TENOR]

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Stade vom 24. Juni 2019 wird als unbegründet verworfen; jedoch wird die in Thailand erlittene Abschiebungshaft im Maßstab 1:3 auf die verhängte Freiheitsstrafe angerechnet.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

[GRUENDE]

Ausweislich der Urteilsgründe (UA S. 30) hat sich der Angeklagte in Thailand neun Tage in Abschiebungshaft befunden (zur Notwendigkeit einer Entscheidung über den Anrechnungsmaßstab bei Abschiebungshaft vgl. BGH, Beschlüsse vom 10. April 1997 - 5 StR 674/96, NStZ 1997, 385; vom 5. Juni 2012 - 4 StR 58/12, NStZ-RR 2012, 271). Um jede Benachteiligung des Angeklagten auszuschließen, setzt der Senat den Anrechnungsmaßstab auf 1:3 fest (vgl. dazu BGH, Urteil vom 5. November 2014 - 1 StR 299/14 Rn. 41; Beschluss vom 22. Dezember 2011 - 4 StR 514/11).

Sander

König

Feilcke

Tiemann

von Schmettau