Insolvency-related suspension of proceedings and rejection of late-filed non-admission complaint
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint for lack of admission of appeal as inadmissible and imposed costs on the complainant, upholding the lower appellate court's refusal to admit the revision. The case involved a dispute worth approximately €60,800, where the defendant failed to file a reasoned complaint within the extended deadline set by the court president. Although the proceedings were suspended on November 1, 2023, due to the opening of insolvency proceedings, the court determined that because the appeal was already procedurally defective prior to this suspension, it could be rejected immediately without waiting for the suspension to end. The decision relied on a corresponding application of § 249 Abs. 3 ZPO, which permits the rejection of an already inadmissible legal remedy and the associated cost assessment during a period of suspension, alongside §§ 544 Abs. 4 and 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the deadlines for filing reasoned complaints.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 249 Abs. 3 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 4 ZPO; Insolvency-related suspension of proceedings and rejection of late-filed non-admission complaint: The case involved a dispute worth approximately €60,800, where the defendant failed to file a reasoned complaint within the extended deadline set by the court president. Although the proceedings were suspended on November 1, 2023, due to the opening of insolvency proceedings, the court determined that because the appeal was already procedurally defective prior to this suspension, it could be rejected immediately without waiting for the suspension to end. The decision relied on a corresponding application of § 249 Abs. 3 ZPO, which permits the rejection of an already inadmissible legal remedy and the associated cost assessment during a period of suspension, alongside §§ 544 Abs. 4 and 97 Abs. 1 ZPO regarding the deadlines for filing reasoned complaints.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertMain ground for declaring the complaint for lack of admission of revision inadmissible due to the failure to file a reasoned complaint within the extended deadline.
Procedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify the dismissal of the complaint for not being filed within the prescribed time limit.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 12. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Oldenburg vom 26. Juni 2023 wird auf ihre Kosten als unzulässig verworfen, weil die Beschwerde nicht innerhalb der vom Vorsitzenden bis zum 30. Oktober 2023 verlängerten Frist begründet worden ist (§ 544 Abs. 4, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Streitwert: 60.801,68 €
[GRUENDE]
Nach der Rechtsprechung des Bundesgerichtshofs kann ein Rechtsmittel, das bereits vor der - hier durch die Eröffnung des Insolvenzverfahrens am 1. November 2023 erfolgten - Unterbrechung des Verfahrens unzulässig war, in entsprechender Anwendung der Vorschrift des § 249 Abs. 3 ZPO auch während der Unterbrechung des Verfahrens verworfen werden (siehe bereits BGH, NJW 1959, 532 [zum Revisionsverfahren]; ebenso BGH, Beschlüsse vom 28. August 2012 - XI ZR 236/12, juris Rn. 3; vom 10. Oktober 2013 - III ZR 358/13, juris [jeweils zum Nichtzulassungsbeschwerdeverfahren]). Dies gilt in entsprechender Anwendung von § 249 Abs. 3 ZPO auch für die Kostenentscheidung (BGH, Beschluss vom 28. August 2012 - XI ZR 236/12, aaO; vgl. auch BGH, Beschlüsse vom 10. Oktober 2013 - III ZR 358/13, aaO; vom 3. Dezember 2019 - II ZR 344/17, juris).
Dr. Bünger
Kosziol
Dr. Schmidt
Dr. Matussek
Messing