Withdrawal of appeal in energy regulation dispute renders proceedings moot; determination of amount in dispute under GKG and ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (Cartel Senate) dismissed the appeal by declaring the proceeding never instituted, as the affected party withdrew its complaint in agreement with the Federal Network Agency, thereby leaving the lower decision in force; the court ordered the complainant to bear the costs of the appeal and legal remedy proceedings and set the amount in dispute at €4,948,255. The dispute involved an energy regulation matter where the affected party challenged a decision by the regulatory authority, but the core procedural issue was the withdrawal of the appellate complaint. The decisive legal basis for treating the case as not pending upon withdrawal is established in precedent, with the value in dispute calculated pursuant to § 50 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG in conjunction with § 3 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 50 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG, § 3 ZPO; Withdrawal of appeal in energy regulation dispute renders proceedings moot; determination of amount in dispute under GKG and ZPO: The dispute involved an energy regulation matter where the affected party challenged a decision by the regulatory authority, but the core procedural issue was the withdrawal of the appellate complaint. The decisive legal basis for treating the case as not pending upon withdrawal is established in precedent, with the value in dispute calculated pursuant to § 50 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG in conjunction with § 3 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProvision cited in the dispositive to justify the calculation and fixation of the amount in dispute.
Provision cited in the dispositive to support the determination of the amount in dispute.
Volltext
Die Beschwerdegegnerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens sowie des Rechtsbeschwerdeverfahrens.
Der Gegenstandswert für die Verfahren wird auf
4.948.255 €
festgesetzt.
[GRUENDE]
Die Betroffene hat die Beschwerde im Einvernehmen mit der Bundesnetzagentur zurückgenommen. Die Rücknahme der Beschwerde bewirkt, dass das Verfahren als nicht anhängig geworden anzusehen ist (BGH, Beschlüsse vom 27. August 2013 - EnVR 19/10, juris Rn. 1; vom 23. April 2013 - EnVR 47/12, juris Rn. 2 mwN).
Die Festsetzung des Gegenstandswerts beruht auf § 50 Abs. 1 Satz 1 Nr. 2 GKG und § 3 ZPO.
Kirchhoff
Tolkmitt
Picker
Holzinger
Kochendörfer