KapMuG model proceedings: designation of Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin and recharacterization of joinder appeal as Beitritt under § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) ordered the designation of the lead defendant as the counterparty to the representative appeal (Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin) pursuant to § 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG, and recharacterized the joinder party’s separate legal appeal as a joinder to the representative plaintiff's appeal under § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG, thereby consolidating the proceedings with the representative plaintiff’s position prevailing over the procedural status of the other appellants. This decision arose in a collective damages action under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG), where the procedural dispute centered on the proper configuration of parties and appeals following a first-instance judgment. The decisive legal basis relies on the specific procedural framework of the KapMuG for model proceedings, specifically the court's power to appoint the representative counterparty and its authority to reinterpret independent appeals as joiners to ensure uniform handling of the legal questions in the model case.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG, § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG; KapMuG model proceedings: designation of Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin and recharacterization of joinder appeal as Beitritt under § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG: 1 Satz 2 KapMuG, and recharacterized the joinder party’s separate legal appeal as a joinder to the representative plaintiff's appeal under § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG, thereby consolidating the proceedings with the representative plaintiff’s position prevailing over the procedural status of the other appellants. This decision arose in a collective damages action under the German Capital Markets Model Case Act (KapMuG), where the procedural dispute centered on the proper configuration of parties and appeals following a first-instance judgment. The decisive legal basis relies on the specific procedural framework of the KapMuG for model proceedings, specifically the court's power to appoint the representative counterparty and its authority to reinterpret independent appeals as joiners to ensure uniform handling of the legal questions in the model case.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis for ordering the designation of the model defendant as the counterparty to the representative appeal.
Procedural rule applied to recharacterize the joinder party's independent appeal as a joinder to the representative plaintiff's appeal.
Volltext
Die Musterbeklagte zu 1 wird gemäß § 21 Abs. 1 Satz 2 KapMuG zur Musterrechtsbeschwerdegegnerin bestellt. Im Hinblick auf die von der Musterklägerin eingelegte Rechtsbeschwerde ist die Rechtsbeschwerde der Beigeladenen als solche nicht mehr zu berücksichtigen und in einen Beitritt gemäß § 20 Abs. 3 Satz 1 KapMuG umzudeuten (BGH, Beschluss vom 17. Dezember 2020 – II ZB 31/14, ZIP 2021, 346 Rn. 31, 42).
Born
B. Grüneberg
V. Sander
von Selle
Adams