Insufficiency of violence experience finding immaterial where joint perpetration established via dynamic facts and witness testimony

The Federal Court of Justice (6th Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the Landgericht Braunschweig's conviction and sentencing the defendant to bear the costs of the legal remedy. The dispute centered on the validity of a judgment for joint perpetration (Mittäterschaft) of a criminal offense, where the defendant challenged the lower court's failure to legally substantiate the finding that he was "experienced with violence" (gewalterfahren). The Court determined that this legal error was not decisive because the trial court's conclusion of joint perpetration was primarily and sufficiently grounded in the dynamic facts of the commission of the crime and witness testimonies, rather than relying on the flawed characterization of the defendant's violent experience.