BGH: Confiscation of 700 € from criminal proceeds in money-laundering case on appeal; scope and joint liability of asset forfeiture under German Criminal Code
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (3rd Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the lower court's conviction and sentence, but modified the confiscation order based on the General Public Prosecutor's request to confiscate 700 € of proceeds from the offense as a joint and several liability. The case involved an appeal against a judgment by the Landgericht Kleve (Outlying Criminal Chamber in Moers) from May 25, 2022, where the primary legal issue addressed was the proper scope and calculation of the confiscation of value from criminal proceeds under German criminal law. The decision confirms that while the main judgment stands, the specific financial penalty regarding asset confiscation was adjusted to strictly align with the identified value of the illicit gains.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertBGH: Confiscation of 700 € from criminal proceeds in money-laundering case on appeal; scope and joint liability of asset forfeiture under German Criminal Code: The case involved an appeal against a judgment by the Landgericht Kleve (Outlying Criminal Chamber in Moers) from May 25, 2022, where the primary legal issue addressed was the proper scope and calculation of the confiscation of value from criminal proceeds under German criminal law. The decision confirms that while the main judgment stands, the specific financial penalty regarding asset confiscation was adjusted to strictly align with the identified value of the illicit gains.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Kleve - Auswärtige Strafkammer in Moers - vom 25. Mai 2022 wird als unbegründet verworfen; jedoch wird der Ausspruch über die Einziehung aus den Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts dahin geändert, dass gegen den Angeklagten die Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen in Höhe von 700 € als Gesamtschuldner angeordnet wird.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Schäfer
Paul
Hohoff
Anstötz
Voigt