Objection to court cost assessment limited to violation of cost law; unauthorized attorney action excluded

The court dismissed the plaintiff's objection (Erinnerung) against the court fee assessment dated November 4, 2019, ruling in favor of the validity of the assessed costs. The dispute concerned the procedural legality of the fee calculation in a case involving a non-admission complaint (Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde), where the plaintiff argued that the attorney who filed the complaint acted without a valid mandate, thereby challenging the necessity of the fees. The court held that an objection under § 66 of the Court Costs Act (GKG) must be based solely on a violation of cost law, whereas the plaintiff's argument regarding the attorney's lack of mandate constitutes a separate contractual issue that must be resolved between the parties. The decision confirmed that the fee assessment was legally correct under GKV 1242 and was issued without further court fees or reimbursement of extrajudicial costs pursuant to § 66 Abs. 8 GKG.