Confiscation of seized mobile device; admissibility of revision challenging procedural ruling due to incomplete submission of prior order under § 344 StPO

The Federal Court of Criminal Procedure rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the lower court's conviction, while modifying the sentence to include the confiscation of a specific mobile device as requested by the General Federal Prosecutor; the defendant is liable for the costs of the appellate proceedings. The dispute concerned an appeal against a verdict from the Landgericht Dessau-Roßlau, which also involved a challenge to the rejection of a request to stay proceedings, a plea that the appellate court deemed inadmissible due to incomplete factual submission. The decisive legal basis for the procedural rejection was § 344 Abs. 2 Satz 2 StPO, which requires the full content of the lower court's decision rejecting the stay to be included in the notice of appeal to satisfy the requirements for a valid objection under §§ 200 and 265 StPO.