Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
6 StR 557/23 ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:200224B6STR557.23.0 KI-generiert

Objection to refusal of further evidence under § 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO

Geschäftsnummer 6 StR 557/23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The German Federal Court of Justice (6th Criminal Division) dismissed the defendant's appeal against the judgment of the Saarbrücken Regional Court dated July 31, 2023, ruling that the appeal was unfounded and ordering the appellant to bear the legal costs. The dispute centered on the defendant's procedural objection (Verfahrensrüge) challenging the trial court's refusal to obtain specific evidence. The Court determined that the Regional Court had correctly applied Section 244 (3) Sentence 3 Number 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) in lawfully rejecting the defendant's motion to take further evidence, thereby upholding the lower court's original decision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO; Objection to refusal of further evidence under § 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO: The dispute centered on the defendant's procedural objection (Verfahrensrüge) challenging the trial court's refusal to obtain specific evidence. The Court determined that the Regional Court had correctly applied Section 244 (3) Sentence 3 Number 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO) in lawfully rejecting the defendant's motion to take further evidence, thereby upholding the lower court's original decision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Verfahrensrügen Beweisantrag Strafprozessordnung Verfahrenskosten Rechtsgutachten Vorabentscheidungsverfahren

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining that the lower court's refusal to take further evidence was legally correct, thereby supporting the dismissal of the procedural objection.
KI-generiert
3 StR 217/11
Denial of co-defendant's evidence motion: admissible only via § 244 Abs. 2 StPO fact-finding plea, not § 244 Abs. 3–6 StPO procedural violation
5 StR 520/23
Admissibility of procedural objection challenging rejection of witness examination for insufficient specific reasoning
3 StR 46/16
Rejection of witness examination motion: strict standard for "intent to delay" vs. total unsuitability of evidence under § 244 Abs. 3 StPO
4 StR 143/21
Admissibility of witness testimony obtained without prior instruction on statutory right to refuse: evidence exclusion for violation of § 52 Abs. 3 StPO
2 StR 249/25
Admissibility of post-appeal objections against the rejection of an appeal as unfounded

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO

Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for determining that the lower court's refusal to take further evidence was legally correct, thereby supporting the dismissal of the procedural objection.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Saarbrücken vom 31. Juli 2023 wird als unbegründet verworfen.

Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.

Ergänzend zur Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts bemerkt der Senat, dass die Verfahrensrüge jedenfalls unbegründet ist. Das Landgericht hat die Beweiserhebung rechtsfehlerfrei nach § 244 Abs. 3 Satz 3 Nr. 2 StPO abgelehnt.

Sander

Tiemann

Wenske

Fritsche

Arnoldi