Judicial recusal based on provision of case excerpts and signature protocols

The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the motion for recusal filed by the defendant against the presiding judge, upholding the judge's impartiality and ruling that the request was unfounded. The dispute concerned a procedural objection within civil litigation, where the movant alleged that the judge’s provision of a case excerpt containing signature protocols of the challenged decision constituted a ground for bias under Section 42(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court held that no official statement from the judge was required because the objection relied solely on matters evident from the case file, and it decisively determined that sharing such administrative documentation did not objectively justify the presumption of partiality necessary for recusal.