Ineffectiveness of prior judgments following withdrawal of claim with defendant's consent under § 269 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) declared the prior rulings of the District Court and the Regional Court of Appeal ineffective, rendering them legally void after the plaintiff withdrew the claim with the defendant’s consent under § 269 Abs. 3 Satz 1, Abs. 4 ZPO, and set the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings at up to €40,000. The case originated as a civil dispute reviewed on appeal, where the procedural posture was resolved by the mutual agreement of the parties to terminate the litigation rather than a substantive judgment on the merits. The decisive legal basis for the outcome was the specific procedural provision permitting the court to declare earlier judgments ineffective upon the withdrawal of a claim with the opposing party's consent.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 269 Abs. 3 Satz 1, Abs. 4 ZPO; Ineffectiveness of prior judgments following withdrawal of claim with defendant's consent under § 269 ZPO: 3 Satz 1, Abs. 4 ZPO, and set the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings at up to €40,000. The case originated as a civil dispute reviewed on appeal, where the procedural posture was resolved by the mutual agreement of the parties to terminate the litigation rather than a substantive judgment on the merits. The decisive legal basis for the outcome was the specific procedural provision permitting the court to declare earlier judgments ineffective upon the withdrawal of a claim with the opposing party's consent.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis for declaring the prior judgments ineffective after the plaintiff withdrew the claim with the defendant's consent.
Volltext
Die Urteile der 8. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts Potsdam vom 19. Dezember 2018 und des 4. Zivilsenats des Brandenburgischen Oberlandesgerichts vom 13. November 2019 sind wirkungslos, nachdem der Kläger seine Klage mit Zustimmung der Beklagten zurückgenommen hat (§ 269 Abs. 3 Satz 1, Abs. 4 ZPO).
Der Streitwert für das Revisionsverfahren wird auf bis 40.000 € festgesetzt.
Ellenberger
Grüneberg
Matthias
Derstadt
Schild von Spannenberg