Scope of guilt: Instigation of aggravated robbery in legal concurrence with endangering bodily harm

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's revision as unfounded, upholding the conviction from the Landgericht Braunschweig while clarifying the finding of guilt to specify that the defendant was guilty of instigating aggravated robbery committed in legally concurrent offense with endangering bodily harm; the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the appeal. The case involved a criminal appeal challenging the conviction for instigation of a particularly serious robbery that also constituted endangering bodily harm. The decisive legal basis centered on the doctrines of instigation (Anstiftung), aggravated robbery (besonders schwerer Raub), and legal concurrence of offenses (Tateinheit) under German criminal law.