Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
VIa ZR 970/23 ECLI:DE:BGH:2024:210224BVIAZR970.23.0 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of non-admission complaint against multi-party defendant leading to forfeiture of remedy

Geschäftsnummer VIa ZR 970/23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice declared the plaintiff's complaint for leave to appeal against the defendant in No. 2 inadmissible following the plaintiff's withdrawal of that specific portion of the complaint, leaving the appeal against the remaining defendants pending with costs undetermined. The dispute concerned a civil matter litigated before the 25th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, where the plaintiff challenged the court's judgment issued on August 25, 2023. The operative outcome relies on procedural doctrine regarding the withdrawal of a non-acceptance of appeal complaint, resulting in the loss of that specific legal remedy for the withdrawn party without any substantive ruling on the merits by this instance.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Withdrawal of non-admission complaint against multi-party defendant leading to forfeiture of remedy: 2 inadmissible following the plaintiff's withdrawal of that specific portion of the complaint, leaving the appeal against the remaining defendants pending with costs undetermined. The dispute concerned a civil matter litigated before the 25th Civil Senate of the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, where the plaintiff challenged the court's judgment issued on August 25, 2023. The operative outcome relies on procedural doctrine regarding the withdrawal of a non-acceptance of appeal complaint, resulting in the loss of that specific legal remedy for the withdrawn party without any substantive ruling on the merits by this instance.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Streitgegenstand Rückzug des Strafantrags Verwirkung Zivilurteil verfahrensrechtliche Fragen E-Justice
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Der Kläger wird, nachdem er die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde hinsichtlich der Beklagten zu 2 gegen das am 25. August 2023 verkündete Urteil des 25. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Frankfurt am Main zurückgenommen hat, dieses Rechtsmittels für verlustig erklärt.

Eine Kostenentscheidung bleibt vorbehalten.

C. Fischer

Möhring

Krüger

Wille

Liepin