Correction of civil forfeiture order: clarification of the value of criminal proceeds to be confiscated
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (6th Criminal Senate) dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the conviction and procedural rulings of the Landgericht Ansbach, while simultaneously correcting the forfeiture decision to order the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds in the specific amount of 370 EUR; the defendant bears the costs of the appeal. The dispute centered on the proper enforcement of criminal forfeiture regarding the defendant's criminal proceeds, with the General Public Prosecutor intervening to clarify the scope of the initial confiscation order. The decisive legal basis involves the substantive requirements for the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds under German criminal procedure law, specifically the power of the appellate court to re-formulate confiscation orders to ensure legal clarity and compliance with statutory limits when the original lower court decision was insufficiently precise.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCorrection of civil forfeiture order: clarification of the value of criminal proceeds to be confiscated: The dispute centered on the proper enforcement of criminal forfeiture regarding the defendant's criminal proceeds, with the General Public Prosecutor intervening to clarify the scope of the initial confiscation order. The decisive legal basis involves the substantive requirements for the confiscation of the value of criminal proceeds under German criminal procedure law, specifically the power of the appellate court to re-formulate confiscation orders to ensure legal clarity and compliance with statutory limits when the original lower court decision was insufficiently precise.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Ansbach vom 30. Juni 2023 wird als unbegründet verworfen; jedoch wird die Einziehungsentscheidung aus den Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts klarstellend wie folgt neu gefasst: In Höhe von 370 Euro wird die Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen angeordnet.
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
Sander
Feilcke
Tiemann
von Schmettau
Arnoldi