Admissibility of revisionary appeal against appellate decision in civil dispute
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) granted the plaintiff's leave to appeal, thereby permitting a revisionary challenge to the decision of the Oberlandesgericht Nürnberg dated January 25, 2023, while explicitly dismissing the plaintiff's request for exemption from paying interest on extrajudicial attorney fees. This procedural ruling addresses a civil dispute where the plaintiff sought to contest the lower appellate court's order, resulting in the plaintiff prevailing on the threshold issue of admissibility, which allows the case to proceed to the BGH for substantive review. The legal basis for the partial dismissal regarding the interest exemption relies on established precedents (BGH, March 14, 2017 - XI ZR 508/15; BGH, October 12, 2017 - IX ZR 267/17) affirming that such interest is generally payable, whereas the grant of revisionary leave follows the standard assessment of whether the appeal meets the requirements for review under the German Code of Civil Procedure.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO; Admissibility of revisionary appeal against appellate decision in civil dispute: This procedural ruling addresses a civil dispute where the plaintiff sought to contest the lower appellate court's order, resulting in the plaintiff prevailing on the threshold issue of admissibility, which allows the case to proceed to the BGH for substantive review. The legal basis for the partial dismissal regarding the interest exemption relies on established precedents (BGH, March 14, 2017 - XI ZR 508/15; BGH, October 12, 2017 - IX ZR 267/17) affirming that such interest is generally payable, whereas the grant of revisionary leave follows the standard assessment of whether the appeal meets the requirements for review under the German Code of Civil Procedure.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertProcedural rule cited in the dispositive to justify waiving a written reasoning for the decision on the leave to appeal.
Volltext
Auf die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerde des Klägers wird - unter deren Zurückweisung im Umfang der begehrten Freistellung von Zinsen auf die außergerichtlichen Rechtsanwaltskosten (vgl. BGH, Urteil vom 14. März 2017 - XI ZR 508/15, NJW-RR 2017, 942 Rn. 34; Urteil vom 12. Oktober 2017 - IX ZR 267/17, NJW 2018, 1006 Rn. 28) - die Revision gegen den Beschluss des 17. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Nürnberg vom 25. Januar 2023 zugelassen.
Von einer Begründung wird gemäß § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2 Halbsatz 2 ZPO abgesehen.
Menges
Möhring
Krüger
Wille
Liepin