Inadmissibility of complaint against non-appealable court decision under § 304 Abs. 4 StPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's complaint as inadmissible at his own expense, thereby leaving the prior decision of the Oberlandesgericht Hamm in force. The dispute concerned a procedural ruling issued by the higher court, where the defendant attempted to challenge a specific judicial order through a direct complaint. The decisive legal basis was § 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO, which categorically bars the use of the standard complaint mechanism for this particular type of decision, rendering the appeal structurally unpermissible.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO; Inadmissibility of complaint against non-appealable court decision under § 304 Abs. 4 StPO: The dispute concerned a procedural ruling issued by the higher court, where the defendant attempted to challenge a specific judicial order through a direct complaint. The decisive legal basis was § 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO, which categorically bars the use of the standard complaint mechanism for this particular type of decision, rendering the appeal structurally unpermissible.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the dispositive as the main ground for dismissing the complaint as inadmissible because the specific decision could not be appealed via complaint.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdeführers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Hamm vom 17. Juni 2025 ‒ Az.: III-1 Ws 124/25 ‒ wird auf seine Kosten als unzulässig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (§ 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO).
Menges Zimmermann Herold