Inadmissibility of appeal against appellate court decision on mandatory defense counsel appointment under § 304 Abs. 4 StPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Criminal Justice (BGH) dismissed the complainant's appeal as inadmissible, ruling in favor of the appellate court whose decision remains in force. The dispute concerned a procedural challenge to a decision by the Oberlandesgericht Bamberg regarding the appointment of a defense attorney. The BGH held that the appeal was procedurally barred because the specific category of orders issued by the appellate court is not subject to further review under § 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO. Consequently, the court refused to appoint a lawyer for the complainant, citing the prior dismissal of the appeal.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO; Inadmissibility of appeal against appellate court decision on mandatory defense counsel appointment under § 304 Abs. 4 StPO: The dispute concerned a procedural challenge to a decision by the Oberlandesgericht Bamberg regarding the appointment of a defense attorney. The BGH held that the appeal was procedurally barred because the specific category of orders issued by the appellate court is not subject to further review under § 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO. Consequently, the court refused to appoint a lawyer for the complainant, citing the prior dismissal of the appeal.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the challenged decision by the appellate court is not subject to appeal.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beschwerdeführers gegen den Beschluss des Oberlandesgerichts Bamberg vom 29. April 2024 ‒ Az.: 1 Ws 297/24 ‒ wird auf seine Kosten als unzulässig verworfen, weil dieser Beschluss nicht mit der Beschwerde angefochten werden kann (§ 304 Abs. 4 Satz 2 Halbsatz 1 StPO).
Die Beiordnung eines Rechtsanwalts kommt angesichts der Unzulässigkeit der Beschwerde nicht in Betracht (vgl. BGH, Beschluss vom 11. März 2005 - 2 ARs 61/05, juris).
Menges
Zimmermann
Herold