Inadmissible Anhörungsrüge due to lack of substantiation of alleged violation of the right to be heard and filing outside the statutory deadline

The German Federal Court of Criminal Justice (BGH), Second Criminal Senate, dismissed the appellant's complaint for lack of hearing (Anhörungsrüge) as inadmissible, ordering the appellant to bear the costs of the proceedings and noting that no further submissions would be answered. The dispute concerned an objection to a prior court order dated March 21, 2025, with the appellant alleging a violation of his right to be heard by the panel. The court determined the complaint was procedurally deficient because it was filed late on November 14, 2025, and the appellant failed to substantiate a breach of the constitutional right to legal hearing (rechtliches Gehör), rendering the filing inadmissible under procedural law.