Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
2 StR 495/12, GSSt 2/15 ECLI:DE:BGH:2016:090816B2STR495.12.0 KI-generiert

Withdrawal of criminal law reference question to Constitutional Court

Geschäftsnummer 2 StR 495/12, GSSt 2/15
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang struck_off

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Criminal Procedure withdrew its reference question to the Federal Constitutional Court, leaving the previous lower-court proceedings or orders in force without new substantive judicial review on the merits. The case concerned a criminal law dispute where the appellate court had posed a preliminary question regarding the interpretation or validity of specific legal norms, a procedure initiated to resolve a constitutional or statutory uncertainty before concluding the criminal trial. The decisive legal basis involved the procedural mechanism for a preliminary reference (Vorlage) under German constitutional and criminal procedural law, which was terminated by the withdrawing court's voluntary decision rather than a merits-based rejection or acceptance by the constitutional court.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

Withdrawal of criminal law reference question to Constitutional Court: The case concerned a criminal law dispute where the appellate court had posed a preliminary question regarding the interpretation or validity of specific legal norms, a procedure initiated to resolve a constitutional or statutory uncertainty before concluding the criminal trial. The decisive legal basis involved the procedural mechanism for a preliminary reference (Vorlage) under German constitutional and criminal procedural law, which was terminated by the withdrawing court's voluntary decision rather than a merits-based rejection or acceptance by the constitutional court.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
deutsches Bundesverfassungsgericht Rückzug der Verfassungsbeschwerde verfassungsgerichtliche Überweisung Rückzug des Strafantrags Vorabentscheidungsersuchen deutsches Grundgesetz
KI-generiert

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Vorlage wird zurückgenommen.

Fischer Krehl Eschelbach

Ott Zeng