Criminal revision: sufficiency of abbreviated judgment reasoning to support sentencing pronouncement

The Federal Court of Criminal Second Senate dismissed the defendant's appeal as unfounded, upholding the original conviction and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the legal remedy. The case involved a criminal prosecution where the defendant challenged the judgment of the Erfurt District Court, but the appellate review found no legal error to the defendant's detriment, leaving the original sentence in force. The court noted that although a subsequent order supplemented the judgment, the original abbreviated reasoning was legally sufficient to support the sentencing decision, rendering the supplement irrelevant to the outcome.