Criminal revision appeal: Finalization of civil compensation declaration and allocation of appellate costs
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) rejected the defendant's appeal as unfounded, thereby upholding the conviction of the Landgericht Stendal from 7 September 2023, while supplementing the civil compensation (Adhäsion) declaration to explicitly state that no further decision was made on remaining claims. The appellant, who had challenged the lower court's judgment, bore the costs of the appeal, the costs arising from the civil compensation procedure, and the necessary expenses incurred by the civil claimant during the appellate phase. The ruling relies on established procedural principles regarding the finalization of civil compensation declarations in criminal proceedings, ensuring that the civil claim is formally concluded when no further substantive determination is required.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCriminal revision appeal: Finalization of civil compensation declaration and allocation of appellate costs: The appellant, who had challenged the lower court's judgment, bore the costs of the appeal, the costs arising from the civil compensation procedure, and the necessary expenses incurred by the civil claimant during the appellate phase. The ruling relies on established procedural principles regarding the finalization of civil compensation declarations in criminal proceedings, ensuring that the civil claim is formally concluded when no further substantive determination is required.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Rechtsprechung
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
Die Revision des Angeklagten gegen das Urteil des Landgerichts Stendal vom 7. September 2023 wird als unbegründet verworfen; der Adhäsionsausspruch wird jedoch dahin ergänzt, dass im Übrigen von einer Entscheidung abgesehen wird (vgl. BGH, Beschlüsse vom 19. Oktober 2021 – 6 StR 413/21; vom 27. Januar 2021 – 6 StR 439/20).
Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten des Rechtsmittels, die insoweit durch das Adhäsionsverfahren entstandenen Kosten und die dem Adhäsionskläger in der Revisionsinstanz erwachsenen notwendigen Auslagen zu tragen.
Feilcke
Tiemann
Wenske
von Schmettau
Arnoldi