Criminal conviction on appeal: sufficiency of evidentiary objection regarding missing negative test in revision proceedings

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 5th Criminal Senate dismissed the revisions of the defendants as unfounded, rejecting their appeals against the conviction by the Dresden Regional Court, which thereby remains in force; each appellant is ordered to bear the costs of their respective legal remedy. The dispute involved a criminal appeal where the defendants challenged the lower court's judgment, with one specific complaint arguing the absence of a negative medical certificate, but the appellate court found that no legal error to the detriment of the defendants resulted from the review of the record. The decision rests on the standard of appellate review in German criminal procedure, specifically rejecting the appeal for failing to demonstrate a statutory error and dismissing the specific evidentiary objection for lacking the required specificity.