Correction of confiscation decree to specify joint and several liability of multiple defendants for criminal proceeds
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Sixth Criminal Senate of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) upheld the lower court’s judgment in its entirety except for a procedural correction regarding the confiscation of criminal proceeds. The Court amended the confiscation order to explicitly designate the defendants as joint and several debtors, assigning specific liability shares of 700 Euro to the primary defendant, 450 Euro to co-defendant B, and 200 Euro to co-defendant Ay. The primary defendant’s revision was otherwise dismissed as unfounded, and he was ordered to bear the costs of the legal proceeding. The dispute concerned the technical formulation of the confiscation decree under German criminal law, specifically the requirement to name all liable parties as joint debtors (*Gesamtschuldner*) when multiple individuals are responsible for the value of criminal proceeds, ensuring the enforceability of the financial sanction against each party according to their individual share.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertCorrection of confiscation decree to specify joint and several liability of multiple defendants for criminal proceeds: The Court amended the confiscation order to explicitly designate the defendants as joint and several debtors, assigning specific liability shares of 700 Euro to the primary defendant, 450 Euro to co-defendant B, and 200 Euro to co-defendant Ay. The primary defendant’s revision was otherwise dismissed as unfounded, and he was ordered to bear the costs of the legal proceeding. The dispute concerned the technical formulation of the confiscation decree under German criminal law, specifically the requirement to name all liable parties as joint debtors (*Gesamtschuldner*) when multiple individuals are responsible for the value of criminal proceeds, ensuring the enforceability of the financial sanction against each party according to their individual share.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertVolltext
1. Auf die Revision des Angeklagten wird das Urteil des Landgerichts Nürnberg-Fürth vom 2. Oktober 2025 aus den Gründen der Antragsschrift des Generalbundesanwalts vom 18. Februar 2026 im Ausspruch über die Einziehung des Wertes von Taterträgen, auch soweit es die nicht revidierenden Mitangeklagten B. und Ay. betrifft, dahin ergänzt, dass als Gesamtschuldner haften
a) der Angeklagte in Höhe von 700 Euro,
b) die Mitangeklagte B. in Höhe von 450 Euro und
c) die Mitangeklagte Ay. in Höhe von 200 Euro.
2. Die weitergehende Revision wird als unbegründet verworfen.
3. Der Beschwerdeführer hat die Kosten seines Rechtsmittels zu tragen.
von Schmettau
RiBGH Wenske istdienstlich verhindertzu signieren.
Fritsche
von Schmettau
RinBGH Dr. Dietschist krankheitsbedingtverhindert zu signieren.
von Schmettau
Schuster