Waiver of reasoning on non-admission of revision appeal in civil proceedings
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of a revision appeal to the higher court, thereby affirming the lower court's decision and leaving it in force. This decision concluded a civil dispute wherein the plaintiff challenged the appellate court's refusal to grant review of the final judgment, a move the BGH rejected without providing a substantive written reasoning as it was deemed unnecessary for clarifying the prerequisites for admission. The court's order rests on the procedural ground that a motivation for the dismissal would not contribute to legal clarification under Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), while the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings pursuant to Section 97(1) ZPO, with a dispute value set at 62,479.91 euros.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasoning on non-admission of revision appeal in civil proceedings: This decision concluded a civil dispute wherein the plaintiff challenged the appellate court's refusal to grant review of the final judgment, a move the BGH rejected without providing a substantive written reasoning as it was deemed unnecessary for clarifying the prerequisites for admission. The court's order rests on the procedural ground that a motivation for the dismissal would not contribute to legal clarification under Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), while the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings pursuant to Section 97(1) ZPO, with a dispute value set at 62,479.91 euros.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustifies the dismissal of the complaint regarding the non-admission of revision by waiving the written reasoning.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Beschluss des 19. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Köln vom 23. Juni 2022 in der Fassung des Berichtigungsbeschlusses vom 16. August 2022 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 62.479,91 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Jurgeleit Sacher