Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision: waiver of justification under § 544(6) Sentence 2 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Civil Procedure (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of appeal to the higher instance, thereby leaving the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt of May 4, 2021, in force; the plaintiff was ordered to bear all costs of the proceedings, including those resulting from the defendant's ancillary intervention. The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision, which had been entered by a panel of the 7th Civil Senate, though the specific substantive facts and claims are not detailed in the operative text. The court relied on Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence, of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) to waive the written reasoning, as it determined that providing a justification would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting a revision, and applied Sections 97(1) and 101(1) ZPO for cost allocation, setting the amount in dispute at 55,715.65 euros.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 101 Abs. 1 ZPO, § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO; Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision: waiver of justification under § 544(6) Sentence 2 ZPO: The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff sought to challenge the lower court's decision, which had been entered by a panel of the 7th Civil Senate, though the specific substantive facts and claims are not detailed in the operative text. The court relied on Section 544(6) Sentence 2, Second Half-Sentence, of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO) to waive the written reasoning, as it determined that providing a justification would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting a revision, and applied Sections 97(1) and 101(1) ZPO for cost allocation, setting the amount in dispute at 55,715.65 euros.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertJustified the omission of a detailed reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint against the non-admission of revision.
Basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings, including those resulting from the defendant's ancillary intervention.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Klägerin gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 15. Zivilsenats in Kassel des Oberlandesgerichts Frankfurt vom 4. Mai 2021 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Klägerin trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens einschließlich der durch die Nebenintervention auf Seiten des Beklagten entstandenen Kosten (§ 97 Abs. 1, § 101 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 55.715,65 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Graßnack Borris