BGH refuses to state reasons for non-admission of revision where explanation would not clarify admissibility requirements under § 544(6) sentence 2 ZPO

The Federal Court of Justice dismissed the plaintiffs' complaint for non-admission of the appeal on points of law (Beschwerde) against the Oberlandesgericht Munich's decision of March 23, 2021, ordering the plaintiffs to bear the costs of the proceedings with a disputed amount of €64,965.22. The dispute concerns a civil liability matter where the plaintiffs, having failed to meet the high threshold for admitting a revision appeal at the appellate level, challenged this refusal. The court applied § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO to waive a written reasoning, determining that a detailed justification would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which a revision is to be admitted, thereby leaving the appellate court's non-admission decision in force.