Waiver of reasons for dismissing complaint against non-admission of revision appeal under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of an appeal to the revision court, leaving the judgment of the Oberlandesgericht Koblenz from March 4, 2021, in force, with the intervening party bearing the costs of the proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject matter value of €148,000, in which the defendant, acting through an intervening party, sought to challenge the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which the court waived the substantive reasoning for the dismissal because such an explanation was deemed unlikely to contribute to the clarification of the prerequisites under which a revision appeal is admitted.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Waiver of reasons for dismissing complaint against non-admission of revision appeal under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject matter value of €148,000, in which the defendant, acting through an intervening party, sought to challenge the lower court’s refusal to allow the appeal. The decisive legal basis was § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, under which the court waived the substantive reasoning for the dismissal because such an explanation was deemed unlikely to contribute to the clarification of the prerequisites under which a revision appeal is admitted.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the procedural basis for waiving the substantive reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because such reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision appeal.
Cited as the basis for imposing the costs of the complaint proceedings on the intervening party.
Volltext
Die von seinem Streithelfer geführte Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 2. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Koblenz vom 4. März 2021 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Streithelfer des Beklagten trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 148.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Sacher