Admissibility of revision and waiver of reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO in dispute over claim value exceeding 188,000 EUR
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint, upholding the higher regional court's refusal to allow an appeal to the supreme court, thereby leaving the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Rostock in force and assigning the plaintiff the costs of the complaint proceedings. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject value of €188,353.50, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the appellate decision through a revision appeal. The court declined to provide a reasoned decision, invoking § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), on the grounds that such an explanation would not contribute to the clarification of the prerequisites for admitting a revision, and relied on § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO for the cost allocation.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Admissibility of revision and waiver of reasoning under § 544(6) ZPO in dispute over claim value exceeding 188,000 EUR: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a subject value of €188,353.50, where the plaintiff sought to challenge the appellate decision through a revision appeal. The court declined to provide a reasoned decision, invoking § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), on the grounds that such an explanation would not contribute to the clarification of the prerequisites for admitting a revision, and relied on § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO for the cost allocation.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for omitting the reasoning of the decision regarding the dismissal of the complaint.
Basis for imposing the costs of the complaint proceedings on the plaintiff.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 4. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Rostock vom 29. Oktober 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Kläger trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 188.353,50 €
Pamp Halfmeier Sacher
Borris Brenneisen