Refusal to state reasons for non-admission of revision under § 544(6) ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's complaint for non-acceptance of revision, thereby upholding the appellate court's judgment and leaving the lower court decision in force. The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of €40,000, in which the defendant attempted to challenge the Oberlandesgericht München's refusal to accept the case for federal review. The BGH denied the application without providing a substantive reasoning, as it determined that such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, pursuant to § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, with no grounds stated to facilitate future filtering by specific legal issues.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Refusal to state reasons for non-admission of revision under § 544(6) ZPO: The dispute concerned a civil matter with a value in dispute of €40,000, in which the defendant attempted to challenge the Oberlandesgericht München's refusal to accept the case for federal review. The BGH denied the application without providing a substantive reasoning, as it determined that such an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision, pursuant to § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO, with no grounds stated to facilitate future filtering by specific legal issues.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertBasis for omitting the reasoning for the dismissal because it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting revision.
Basis for ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 28. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts München vom 26. März 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 40.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Jurgeleit
Graßnack Hannamann