Legislator Rechtsprechung & Gesetzgebung
DE FR IT EN
In Legislator analysieren
VII ZR 154/23 KI-generiert

Non-acceptance of revision for lack of contributing reasoning to clarify admission prerequisites

Geschäftsnummer VII ZR 154/23
Gericht / Behörde
Rechtsordnung Deutschland (DE)
Entscheiddatum
Ausgang Abgewiesen (Dismissed)
Kostenauflage zulasten Beschwerdeführer/in
Originalquelle öffnen Maschinenlesbares Markdown (.md)

Legislator-Zusammenfassung

KI-generiert

The Federal Court of Justice (BGH) 7th Civil Senate dismissed the defendant's complaint for non-acceptance of revision against the appellate court's judgment, leaving the prior decision in force and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. The case involved a civil dispute with a subject matter value of 703,245.02 euros, where the defendant sought to challenge the Kammergericht's refusal to allow an appeal to the highest civil court. The dismissal was issued without detailed written reasoning pursuant to Section 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as the court determined that such reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the legal prerequisites for admitting a revision.

Legislator-Regeste

KI-generiert

§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Non-acceptance of revision for lack of contributing reasoning to clarify admission prerequisites: The case involved a civil dispute with a subject matter value of 703,245.02 euros, where the defendant sought to challenge the Kammergericht's refusal to allow an appeal to the highest civil court. The dismissal was issued without detailed written reasoning pursuant to Section 544(6) Sentence 2, second half-sentence of the German Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as the court determined that such reasoning would not contribute to clarifying the legal prerequisites for admitting a revision.

Schlagwörter

KI-generiert
Revision eines Entscheids Streitgegenstand Zivilprozessordnung Rückzug des Revisionsgesuchs E-Justice Werturteil

Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO
Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint for non-acceptance of revision.
§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO
Basis for ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
KI-generiert
VII ZR 69/22
Dismissal of complaint against refusal to admit revision without reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
VII ZR 199/21
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision without substantive reasoning
VII ZR 137/24
Denial of revision admission for lack of clarifying effect under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO
VII ZR 5/23
Dismissal of complaint against non-admission of revision due to lack of contribution to clarification of revision prerequisites
VII ZR 196/23
Non-admission of revision complaint: Justification for dispensing with reasoning under § 544 Abs. 6 ZPO

Zentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator

KI-generiert
§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO

Procedural basis cited to justify the omission of a written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint for non-acceptance of revision.

§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO

Basis for ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.

Fragen Sie sich, wie dieser Entscheid auf Ihren Fall anwendbar ist?

Prüfen Sie diesen Entscheid zusammen mit Bundesrecht, kantonalen Erlassen, Kommentaren und Folgeentscheiden in Legislator AI.

Fall in Legislator öffnen →

Volltext

Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 7. Zivilsenats des Kammergerichts vom 30. Juni 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.

Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).

Die Beklagten tragen die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).

Gegenstandswert: 703.245,02 €

Pamp Kartzke Graßnack

Borris Brenneisen