Objection to non-admission of revision: dismissal without reasoned justification under § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the defendant's non-acceptance complaint against the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart's refusal to admit revision, thereby upholding the lower court's decision and ordering the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings. The dispute, with a value in dispute of €93,868.76, involved a civil matter where the defendant challenged the 10th Civil Senate's decision not to allow an appeal to the supreme court. The BGH decided without providing a detailed written justification, applying the provision that such an explanation is omitted when it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Objection to non-admission of revision: dismissal without reasoned justification under § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence ZPO: The dispute, with a value in dispute of €93,868.76, involved a civil matter where the defendant challenged the 10th Civil Senate's decision not to allow an appeal to the supreme court. The BGH decided without providing a detailed written justification, applying the provision that such an explanation is omitted when it would not contribute to clarifying the prerequisites for admitting a revision under § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO).
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertLegal basis cited in the order to waive the written reasoning for the dismissal of the complaint because it would not clarify the conditions for admitting revision.
Legal basis cited in the order to impose the costs of the complaint proceedings on the losing defendant.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde der Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 10. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Stuttgart vom 18. September 2023 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Die Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 93.868,76 €
Pamp Halfmeier Kartzke
Sacher Brenneisen