Revision admission under § 544 ZPO; waiver of reasoning for non-contribution to legal clarification
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (7th Civil Senate) dismissed the defendant's complaint against the non-admission of a revision appeal, thereby upholding the lower appellate court's judgment and leaving the original decision in force, with the defendant ordered to bear the costs of the appellate proceedings. The case involved a civil dispute where the defendant challenged the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig's refusal to allow the case to proceed to the supreme court for further review. The court denied the request without providing a substantive justification, relying on the procedural doctrine that an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which a revision appeal must be admitted, as governed by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, and assessing the subject matter value at €51,418.69 under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Revision admission under § 544 ZPO; waiver of reasoning for non-contribution to legal clarification: The case involved a civil dispute where the defendant challenged the Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig's refusal to allow the case to proceed to the supreme court for further review. The court denied the request without providing a substantive justification, relying on the procedural doctrine that an explanation would not contribute to clarifying the conditions under which a revision appeal must be admitted, as governed by § 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, and assessing the subject matter value at €51,418.69 under § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited in the dispositive to justify the decision to waive the written reasoning because it would not contribute to clarifying the conditions for admitting the revision.
Cited in the dispositive to order the defendant to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Beklagten gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 8. Zivilsenats des Oberlandesgerichts Braunschweig vom 12. September 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Beklagte trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: 51.418,69 €
Pamp Graßnack Sacher
Borris Hannamann