Denial of leave for revision without reasoned justification under § 544(6) ZPO
Deutschland (DE)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Federal Court of Justice (BGH) dismissed the plaintiff's complaint against the non-admission of revision, thereby upholding the judgment of the Higher Regional Court of Brandenburg and leaving that decision in force; the plaintiff was ordered to bear the costs of the proceedings. The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the lower court's refusal to admit an appeal on points of law to the federal court, with a matter in dispute valued at up to €40,000. The BGH declined to provide a substantive written reasoning, relying on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as the explanation would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting a revision, and the non-admission was deemed final under § 97(1) ZPO for cost allocation purposes.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiert§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO, § 97 Abs. 1 ZPO; Denial of leave for revision without reasoned justification under § 544(6) ZPO: The case involved a civil dispute where the plaintiff challenged the lower court's refusal to admit an appeal on points of law to the federal court, with a matter in dispute valued at up to €40,000. The BGH declined to provide a substantive written reasoning, relying on § 544(6) sentence 2, second half-sentence of the Code of Civil Procedure (ZPO), as the explanation would not contribute to clarifying the criteria for admitting a revision, and the non-admission was deemed final under § 97(1) ZPO for cost allocation purposes.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiertZitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertVerwandte Entscheide
KI-generiertZentrale Rechtsfragen, extrahiert von Legislator
KI-generiertCited as the procedural basis for waiving the written reasoning of the decision.
Cited as the basis for ordering the plaintiff to bear the costs of the complaint proceedings.
Volltext
Die Beschwerde des Klägers gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision in dem Urteil des 4. Zivilsenats des Brandenburgischen Oberlandesgerichts vom 25. September 2024 in der Fassung des Berichtigungsbeschlusses vom 19. November 2024 wird zurückgewiesen.
Von einer Begründung wird abgesehen, weil sie nicht geeignet wäre, zur Klärung der Voraussetzungen beizutragen, unter denen eine Revision zuzulassen ist (§ 544 Abs. 6 Satz 2, 2. Halbsatz ZPO).
Der Kläger trägt die Kosten des Beschwerdeverfahrens (§ 97 Abs. 1 ZPO).
Gegenstandswert: bis 40.000 €
Pamp Halfmeier Graßnack
Borris Hannamann